Department of Justice argues against criminalizing homeless people

(NBC News)-The U.S. Justice Department Thursday urged a federal judge to block enforcement of Boise, Idaho, city ordinances making it a crime to sleep in public places when homeless shelter space is unavailable.

“If a person literally has nowhere else to go, then enforcement of the anti-camping ordinance against that person criminalizes her for being homeless,” the government said.

The court filing came in a legal battle that began in 2009 with a lawsuit filed by seven homeless people convicted of violating Boise ordinances that prohibit camping and sleeping in outdoor public places.

Enforcing such laws on nights when there isn’t enough space in homeless shelters, the Justice Department argued Thursday, violates the Constitution’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment.

Boise’s city council voted last year not to enforce its laws when homeless shelters are full. But that did not resolve the dispute.

Supporters of the city laws say when people sleep on the streets, they are unsafe and residents feel less safe.

Lawyers for the city argue in court papers that Boise enforces the ordinances “in the parks, foothills, and other public areas not just to keep them safe and sanitary but also to allow users to utilize the public spaces as they were intended to be used.”

Similar disputes have played out nationwide. A 2014 survey by the National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty found 64 cities with laws like the one in Boise.

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development estimates that half a million people are likely to be homeless on any given night. A study by the U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness found that 42% of homeless people sleep in public locations such as under bridges, in parks, or on the sidewalks.

But the nation’s courts are divided on the constitutionality of anti-camping ordinances.

In 2007, a federal appeals court ruled that enforcement of a Los Angeles anti-camping ordinance may be unconstitutional on nights when adequate shelter space was not available. That decision was vacated after challengers of the law reached a settlement with the city, which agreed to build more shelter spaces. provides commenting to allow for constructive discussion on the stories we cover. In order to comment here, you acknowledge you have read and agreed to our Terms of Service. Commenters who violate these terms, including use of vulgar language or racial slurs, will be banned. Please be respectful of the opinions of others and keep the conversation on topic and civil. If you see an inappropriate comment, please flag it for our moderators to review.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s