Attorneys: Cops in Tamir Rice case reacted on what they knew

FILE - This Nov. 26, 2014 file photo shows a still image taken from a surveillance video recorded on Nov. 22, 2014, that was played at a news conference held by Cleveland Police. It shows Cleveland police officers arriving at Cudell Park on a report of a man with a gun. Twelve-year-old Tamir Rice was fatally shot by Cleveland police, Nov. 22, 2014, after he reportedly pulled a replica gun at the city park. Cuyahoga County prosecutor Tim McGinty announced Monday, Dec. 28, 2015, that a grand jury declined to indict the officer. (Cuyahoga County Prosecutor's Office via AP, File)

CLEVELAND (AP) – The two police officers cleared Monday of criminal charges in the November 2014 fatal shooting of Tamir Rice reacted based on what they knew at the time, that a “guy” was waving a gun and pointing it at people, their attorneys said Tuesday.

It was not until after the shooting, with the gun on the ground, that police learned Tamir was playing with a replica firearm that shoots nonlethal plastic pellets, the lawyers said. And it was not until later that they realized he was a 12-year-old boy, they said.

Frank Garmback, the training officer who drove the cruiser that day, and Timothy Loehmann, the officer who shot Tamir, might have acted differently if they’d been given that information, said Michael Maloney, Garmback’s attorney.

“It would have weighed in,” Maloney said.

The man who called 911 told the call-taker that a “guy” was pulling a gun out of his waistband and was pointing it at people outside a city recreation center. But the caller also said it could be a juvenile and the gun might be a fake.

The call-taker didn’t relay that information to the dispatcher who sent Loehmann and Garmback to the recreation center.

Garmback, a veteran officer, knew the area around the recreation center could be a dangerous place where gang members gathered, his attorney said.

“It’s against this backdrop that he got this call,” Maloney said.

On Monday, county Prosecutor Tim McGinty announced that the two officers wouldn’t be indicted because of “indisputable” evidence that Tamir was reaching for what the officers thought was a real gun tucked in his waistband. McGinty said Tamir was trying to hand the weapon over to police or to show them it wasn’t real, but the officers had no way of knowing that.

Maloney said Garmback was relieved by the grand jury’s decision, which Tamir’s family has condemned.

The two officers are not allowed to return to patrol duties as the city conducts an internal review to determine if they should face administrative discipline.

The attorney for Loehmann, Henry Hilow, said critics have created a national dialogue about the shooting that don’t match the facts about what the officers knew.

“Police are mostly criticized for not responding,” Hilow said. “When they act for the safety of the community, they’re vilified for it.”

Both attorneys said the officers weren’t available for interviews because of a pending federal lawsuit filed by Tamir’s family against them and the city. provides commenting to allow for constructive discussion on the stories we cover. In order to comment here, you acknowledge you have read and agreed to our Terms of Service. Commenters who violate these terms, including use of vulgar language or racial slurs, will be banned. Please be respectful of the opinions of others and keep the conversation on topic and civil. If you see an inappropriate comment, please flag it for our moderators to review.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s