Rolling Stone publisher disagreed with rape story retraction

FILE - In this April 18, 2013 file photo, "Rolling Stone" magazine editor and publisher, Jann Wenner, speaks during the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame Induction Ceremony in Los Angeles. On Friday, Oct. 28, 2016, jurors viewed Wenner's video deposition where he says that he disagreed with a top editor’s decision to retract an entire article about a gang rape at a University of Virginia fraternity after the story was discredited. University dean Nicole Eramo filed a defamation lawsuit against the magazine over the article. She says it portrayed her as the “chief villain” in the 2014 story. (Photo by Danny Moloshok/Invision/AP, File)
FILE - In this April 18, 2013 file photo, "Rolling Stone" magazine editor and publisher, Jann Wenner, speaks during the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame Induction Ceremony in Los Angeles. On Friday, Oct. 28, 2016, jurors viewed Wenner's video deposition where he says that he disagreed with a top editor’s decision to retract an entire article about a gang rape at a University of Virginia fraternity after the story was discredited. University dean Nicole Eramo filed a defamation lawsuit against the magazine over the article. She says it portrayed her as the “chief villain” in the 2014 story. (Photo by Danny Moloshok/Invision/AP, File)

CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA (AP) — Rolling Stone magazine publisher and co-founder Jann Wenner said in a video deposition that he disagreed with a top editor’s decision to retract an entire article about a gang rape at a University of Virginia fraternity after the story was discredited.

In a video played for jurors Friday in the defamation trial against Rolling Stone, Jann Wenner said that although the account given by the woman known only as “Jackie” turned out not to be accurate, the bulk of the 2014 story, “A Rape on Campus,” is still valid, The Daily Progress reports.

The article described in harrowing detail the alleged gang rape of the woman.

A police investigation found no evidence to back up Jackie’s claims and the magazine officially retracted the article in April 2015.

Nicole Eramo, former University of Virginia associate dean of students, is now seeking $7.5 million from the magazine over the story, saying it defamed her and portrayed her as its chief villain. Wenner’s deposition video was played shortly before Eramo’s attorneys rested their case.

Wenner said in the video that although the magazine no longer stands by Jackie’s account, it never retracted the entire article and didn’t intend to. After being asked to read the magazine’s April 2015 note written by then-Managing Editor Will Dana which said “we are officially retracting ‘A Rape on Campus,'” Wenner said he believes that retraction is “inaccurate.”

“I do not stand by it,” Wenner said. “We do not retract the whole story.”

Rolling Stone’s attorneys have argued that the magazine believes its portrayal of Eramo and the university’s handling of sexual assault cases was well-reported and accurate, despite problems with Jackie’s account.

Wenner said the magazine was the “victim” of someone who was “really determined to commit a fraud.” He apologized to Eramo for any damage that the article may have caused, before adding: “Believe me, I have suffered as much as you have.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s