Lawmakers question effectiveness of GPS ankle monitors following murder of OSU student

COLUMBUS (WCMH) – Following the Reagan Tokes murder, two Ohio Legislators are questioning whether GPS ankle monitors are effective and may provide a false sense of security to Ohio Residents. This came after police accused Brian Golsby of killing Ohio State University student Reagan Tokes.  Police said he was wearing a GPS device while committing the killing, along with several other robberies and assaults, in and around the German Village area.

Ohio State Representatives Kristin Boggs and David Leland question if GPS trackers on parolees protect you from dangerous criminals.

“I think that it really lends me to believe that the idea of GPS tracking or GPS monitoring for individuals that are released from incarceration really just provides a falseness of security to the public,” Boggs said.

“We’re not doing a good job of protecting the people in the state of Ohio,” Leland said.

 The state representatives said the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections did not keep a close eye on parolee Golsby.

 Golsby was rejected from halfway houses in Columbus due to his violent past Boggs said.

 “There wasn’t any exclusionary zones put on his monitor. Essentially he had this monitor on with the false assumption that someone is going to be monitoring his whereabouts, and nobody was,” Boggs said.

Exclusionary and inclusionary zones; outline where a parolee can or can not go.  Golsby didn’t have any, and that means he could go anywhere he wanted, and GPS data was recorded and not monitored according to Boggs.

 NBC4 Investigates tried for several days to get an on camera interview with Department of Rehabilitation and Correction’s director Gary Mohr and spokesperson Joellen Smith, to talk about the process of monitoring GPS units and Golsby.

 Smith responded in an email:

As you may know, DRC has respectfully declined all on-camera interviews in regards to this subject.

 Smith cited Ohio law as a reason she can’t talk about either subject.  

 That law is Ohio Revised Code 149.43 which states that the following records are not public record, “Records pertaining to probation and parole proceedings or to proceedings related to the imposition of community control sanctions and post-release control sanctions,.”

 Representative Boggs sees it differently.

 “I think that you don’t want to talk about problems that exist. This is an unfavorable situation,” Boggs said.

Now, Boggs and Leland look to review the way the parole system is operated.

 The goal is to make sure the prison system, parole authority, and halfway houses monitor GPS, and to be sure that police have access to information.

“So you have a system where there is three entities that need to be reviewing this information and understanding where the person on parole that has a GPS monitoring system has been,” Boggs said.

 Boggs and Leland said they are reviewing the parole system and it will be time-consuming, but making improvements is their goal to keep everyone safe.

“We are going to do all we humanly possibly can do to make sure this never happens to someone else,” Leland said.

NBC4i.com provides commenting to allow for constructive discussion on the stories we cover. In order to comment here, you acknowledge you have read and agreed to our Terms of Service. Commenters who violate these terms, including use of vulgar language or racial slurs, will be banned. Please be respectful of the opinions of others and keep the conversation on topic and civil. If you see an inappropriate comment, please flag it for our moderators to review.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s